Mr. Chairman, this year the Armed Services Committee again faced the task of authorizing national defense programs in a time of continuing transition and strategic uncertainty, a period of continuing analysis and development of fundamental defense doctrine, and in the face of increasingly severe Federal budgetary constraints. The committee held a number of hearings to explore these issues, in order to build an analytical base for the ongoing defense debate. We heard testimony on the situations unfolding in the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and on the Korean peninsula. We analyzed DOD's Bottom-Up Review and its planning scenarios, the Navy's ship acquisition strategy, and our military airlift requirements. We employed the emergence and importance of peace operations in this changed environment. Although broad differences of opinion exist within the committee regarding the pace and scale of the post-cold-war force changes, we reported H.R. 4301 on a 55-1 vote. This near unanimity reflects a determination to fill the bill within budget limitations, while structuring programs to provide the training and material necessary so our forces can meet their missions. The future will require an even more vigorous debate, to answer the many remaining questions. What military role remains for nuclear weapons in our arsenal, if any?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Armed Services Committee's work on national defense programs and budget constraints.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
First, good and decent human beings have arisen in the well of the House on both sides of this aisle, people whom I respect with a great sense of sincerity. Second, there have been a number of eloquent and articulate, compelling, and…
it is very frustrating to try to argue in the context of this bill and the important issue that gets raised by it, it is one thing for our adversaries not to listen, but it is certainly disconcerting when our ostensible friends are not…
First, as I understand the Hamilton amendment, it calls upon the President to work multilaterally to find a peacefully negotiated solution. I read this amendment, as provided in section 1, that the clear policy of the U.S. Government is to…
Mr. Chairman, this amendment is a slick way to avoid paying our bills to the United Nations. This amendment is a little too cute. It pulls the rug out from under the United Nations--the problem is: We are standing on that same rug. This…





