We now find ourselves in the context of a post-cold-war world, a significant period in American world history. We do not even know quite how to name it. We simply call it post-cold war. But it is a moment that provides with it an enormous opportunity, Mr. Speaker, an enormous opportunity to redefine our national security agenda, redefine our national security strategy in the context of the realities of the post-cold-war world. I believe that that new post-cold-war national security strategy ought to embrace three elements: First, a healthy, vibrant American economy, which means a well-educated, well-informed, well-trained American citizenry, healthy, where there is a commitment to full employment, commitment to our children, commitment to our future. The second element of our national security strategy ought to be a foreign policy rooted in the notions of prevention, where there is a heavier reliance on political, economic, social and diplomatic solutions to problems that would preclude the need to go to the extraordinary step of war.
Ronald Dellums: “We now find ourselves in the context of a post-cold-war world, a significant period in American world history. We do not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need to redefine national security strategy in a post-cold-war context.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
I understand where the majority of this body is going on a date certain; that is the easy political thing to do. But I think we ought to be part of the educative process, and I choose to try to do that. First of all, to this notion, Mr…
I would like to finally thank all the members of the staff on both sides of the aisle. For many of my colleagues who are not aware, many of these young people spent numerous weekends away from their relatives, family, and friends, in order…
One very quick response to the gentleman is: The logic. Do we build up to build down. To build up we are going to spend billions of dollars and we know we are ultimately going to build down. That is the answer to the gentleman's point…
I took President Bush to court in order to preserve the prerogative of Congress when many of my colleagues did not have the heart to do it. This is not what this debate is about. This is not Congress' war-making power. This is about…





