I thank the gentleman. Quickly, if I hear the gentleman correctly, then, he is suggesting that no amendments in perpetuity will be allowed to cut any other budget other than the military budget; housing, welfare, education, all these other programs. We will not allow amendments to reduce those budgets either? Because if that is the case, I can show the gentleman chapter and verse where those kinds of amendments were allowed. This is big money, 267. So are we setting a new precedent or establishing a new policy? Because if we are, this is a major point of departure.
Ronald Dellums: “I thank the gentleman. Quickly, if I hear the gentleman correctly, then, he is suggesting that no amendments in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget amendments related to military and social programs.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
I would assert here, very straightforward and very aggressively, that how a Nation chooses to spend its money is a profound statement about a Nation's principles, its values and its priorities. And in that regard I am extremely proud to…
I just felt compelled to make that observation. I think that disadvantages a number of Members on both sides of the aisle, but that is just my observation, and leadership going to have to make the judgment that they choose to make…
I would simply yield myself 30 seconds to say that this is a debate that takes us beyond rhetoric, and I think to use the term rhetoric is not advisable in the context of this debate. We are talking about life and death here, and to demean…
I believe the gentleman is absolutely correct, he has beefed up these provisions and I think appropriately. I would be more than happy to work with the gentleman in the context of the conference to move it in the direction of the…





