Very briefly let me respond to my colleague by saying this amendment embraces the spirit of what we are attempting to do. It is not a duplication in detail because, as the gentleman is well aware, the piece of legislation that we offered is very detailed and very specific. A great deal of thought and effort went into it. This amendment in the nature of a substitute embraces the spirit of that amendment, but it does not get to all of the details that the gentleman and I laid out as we worked through that amendment.
Ronald Dellums: “Very briefly let me respond to my colleague by saying this amendment embraces the spirit of what we are attempting to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
Significant philanthropic efforts are under way at the Presidio where sizeable pledges have been made to the National Park Service. In addition to the potential threat to philanthropic interests, it would be difficult for the Presidio…
I just felt compelled to make that observation. I think that disadvantages a number of Members on both sides of the aisle, but that is just my observation, and leadership going to have to make the judgment that they choose to make…
Mr. Chairman, when the gentleman talked about conventional deterrents, it is not in the platform, it is in the weapons. And the weapons are standoff smart bombs and precision-guided missiles. Second, remember, we do not have zero, we have…
One very quick response to the gentleman is: The logic. Do we build up to build down. To build up we are going to spend billions of dollars and we know we are ultimately going to build down. That is the answer to the gentleman's point…





