very briefly let me respond to my colleague by saying this amendment embraces the spirit of what we are attempting to do. It is not a duplication in detail because, as the gentleman is well aware, the piece of legislation that we offered is very detailed and very specific. A great deal of thought and effort went into it. This amendment in the nature of a substitute embraces the spirit of that amendment, but it does not get to all of the details that the gentleman and I laid out as we worked through that amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
I believe the role of peacekeeper in the post-cold war world is very important. What I was simply trying to suggest is that at the point where we take sides, or make enemies, we no longer become credible as a peacekeeper trying to bring…
First, as I understand the Hamilton amendment, it calls upon the President to work multilaterally to find a peacefully negotiated solution. I read this amendment, as provided in section 1, that the clear policy of the U.S. Government is to…
My first observation would be, as you listen very carefully to this debate, it is a classic example of why significant policy with such extraordinary implications should not be offered on the floor and debated on the floor when you have…
I am concerned that the language of section 1202 of the gentleman's amendment might imply a war powers authorization to the President for the use of United States military force in Bosnia.





