the gentleman now raises a question about theater ballistic missiles. The proponent of the amendment before the body at this point has squarely put that issue before us, saying that that is a significant priority. However, the gentleman's discussion in this bill is about national missile defense systems, and we are saying that is tens of billions of dollars, and it is going in the wrong direction, because it does not speak to the likelihood of what might be a provocation. That is a terrorist provocation, not an over the horizon missile.
Ronald Dellums: “the gentleman now raises a question about theater ballistic missiles. The proponent of the amendment before the body at…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of national missile defense systems during a debate.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
Mr. Chairman, let me surface an issue that has not been dealt with and just put it on the table so we all can look at it. That is that this bill, there is joint jurisdiction on this piece of legislation. The tragedy of this institution is…
So this is not about B-2. We have them. It is about an extraordinary amount of money. Now, as I said, the CBO costed out at $27 billion to build nine. The Comptroller, $21 billion. Let us look at the budget. Mr. Chairman, if you will…
we come to the last moments of this debate. I have stated on numerous occasions that the most significant thing that any of us do is to adopt a national budget for this country, because our budget speaks to our values, our principles, and…
There is considerable concern, I would like to say to my distinguished colleague from Colorado, at both the local level and the Federal level, that the environmental cleanup proposed by the Department of the Army for the Presidio in San…





