My first observation would be, as you listen very carefully to this debate, it is a classic example of why significant policy with such extraordinary implications should not be offered on the floor and debated on the floor when you have not had adequate time in the context of committee proceedings to deliberate carefully. None of us knows the awesome implications of this amendment. This is not the place to simply offer an amendment without having laid the prefatory base for this amendment. Having made that observation, I rise in opposition to the Gingrich amendment because I believe this is bad foreign policy, from whatever vantage point one views it. The amendment would unilaterally change the mechanism by which U.S. assessments for U.N. peacekeeping operations are determined and paid. It would limit our U.N. peacekeeping contributions in a fashion that would do damage, in this gentleman's opinion, to our overall foreign policy and, to national security interests. This amendment may appeal to some because it appears to hit hard at the United Nations. I would suggest that this amendment is rather anti- United States rather than anti-United Nations. It strikes at the heart of American interests in preventing wars from erupting and expanding.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Gingrich amendment related to U.N. peacekeeping funding during committee debate.
Share
More from Ronald Dellums
the amendment before the body at this time is an amendment that would repeal, and I would repeat, repeal the requirement for Selective Service registration of 18-year-old men effective October 1, 1994. It does not, Mr. Chairman, apply to…
If the distinguished chairman will yield, I thank the gentleman for his concerns and for his advice and assistance concerning these and other important issues in our bill that related in part to foreign affairs. Relations among the…
Would we use unilateral air power to save the Bosnians if they are being overwhelmed? If that does not work, will we send in ground troops? Or will we say, ``Nice try,'' but leave the Bosnians to fate? This could further endanger American…
very briefly let me respond to my colleague by saying this amendment embraces the spirit of what we are attempting to do. It is not a duplication in detail because, as the gentleman is well aware, the piece of legislation that we offered…





