I think you addressed this. He sent a letter supposedly refuting your testimony.

I want to thank you for the extraordinary work you have done throughout your career to really clean the air not only for Californians but all the rest of the country.

I think Chair Nichols will--OK. I think I have run out of time. So, I yield back.

nearly 4 in 10 Americans live in areas with dangerous air pollution.

the fight against climate change and the fight to clean our air and improve public health are intertwined.

If we go back in the opposite direction that my two grandchildren are going to be facing smog alerts like my children don't have to--however, like I had to.

the Trump administration's EPA is once again abdicating its responsibility to protect public health and the environment.

This deeply flawed legal argument is an enormous mistake that will throw the entire American automobile industry into chaos for years.

Obviously, if this was rejected at this time, we know there would be disastrous outcome should the administration move forward.

Under the Clean Air Act, federally funded transportation projects must demonstrate that they meet air quality goals.

Chair Nichols actually states that California was open to accommodation, such as adjustments to compliance, timing, and flexibility.