Ensuring that the maximum amount of spectrum in the C-band is made available for 5G, while respecting the needs of incumbent users, should be a shared principle in our approach to this issue.

I have significant concerns that the Commission may be pursuing alternatives to public auctions that could divert proceeds from American taxpayers to private corporations.

I believe we need a comprehensive approach that advances 5G while also making investments that will strengthen rural broadband.

While many of us were excited about the promise of the RFS and the opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from our Nation's transportation sector, it's been clear for the past two and a half years that it's not an interest of this administration to execute the programs Congress intended and abundantly obvious that the ultimate goal of the RFS to combat climate change is not one shared by the President or his political appointees.

It is my belief that, above all, we should be striving to provide the benefits of this taxpayer-owned resource of the American public.

Our focus on 5G cannot come at the expense of real students, businesses, doctors, and farmers that still need reliable, high-speed broadband.

this is a public asset. Even FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said a couple weeks ago, this is a public asset.

My biggest concern is that lies spread faster than the speed of light in the internet, while truth seems to go at a snail's pace on it.

It is amazing that we are here today when we think about how far the internet has progressed.

If Facebook doesn't want to play referee about the truth in political speech, then they should get out of the game.

We must continue to consider policies as per U.S. leadership and innovation in the 5G race.