By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 144 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 144 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 46) relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 15, 2019. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit. Sec. 2. The provisions of section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622) shall not apply during the remainder of the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress to a joint resolution terminating the national emergency declared by the President on February 15, 2019. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from California is recognized for 1 hour.
Norma Torres: “By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 144 and ask for its immediate consideration. The…”
Share
More from Norma Torres
I rise in strong opposition of this deeply flawed bill because the American people deserve better. Since Trump returned to office, Republicans have created an affordability nightmare, a mass transfer of hard-earned taxpayer dollars to…
Today, we are discussing yet another dangerous Supreme Court decision, which reversed the 40-year-old Chevron doctrine.
We are not just debating a budget. We are debating whether this House has the backbone to stand up to an administration that is addicted to cruelty. If Members want to fund violence, do it on your own time. Do not do it with the blood and…
In recent time, we have seen this conservative, politically motivated, and activist Supreme Court overturn settled law, like Roe v. Wade, which protected women for more than--for almost 50 years.





