I rise in defense of the committee position and in opposition to the Istook amendment. Mr. Chairman, this guidance which is contained in the bill does not create any new requirements or place any new mandates on recipients of Federal funds. It simply clarifies the Department's long-standing policy so that recipients have clear, concise, and constructive information about their responsibilities under title IV. This information helps grantees be sure that they are in compliance with the law, as it has been in effect for over 30 years. This guidance is intended to be flexible and recognizes that there are no one-size-fits-all solutions. The guidance on limited English proficiency also clarifies that recipients only have to undertake reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access and that recipients are not required to take steps that would incur unreasonable costs or burdens.
Nancy Pelosi: “I rise in defense of the committee position and in opposition to the Istook amendment. Mr. Chairman, this guidance which…”
On the recordOctober 11, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the Istook amendment during a discussion on the Labor-HHS bill.
Share
More from Nancy Pelosi
Jul 17, 2026
We choose what to fund as a nation – and most Americans prioritize their health care.
Jun 19, 2026
No putting down having a fight. If that’s what people enjoy seeing, go to the arena. But don’t do that at the White House.
Jul 17, 2026
The United States must be a force for security and stability. The American people are rightly demanding an end to a perpetual cycle of war, and the Netanyahu government cannot maintain its current course.
Jul 29, 2026
As one who is committed to a strong U.S.-Israel relationship and supportive of a two-state solution, I respect Leader Jeffries’ decisive proposals to achieve a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.





