the Senator from Texas is right. This is a significant change in procurement policy. The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, which has jurisdiction over Federal procurement policy, has not had a single hearing to consider this issue and the impact it will have on the procurement process. I think at the outset it ought to be observed that it is very unfair to publicly accuse a company of being a tax cheat when they have not violated one single law, rule, or regulation of the United States. I have been informed since this discussion has been going on that one of the many unintended consequences, probably, and potentially unintended results, is one involving a company called Intelsat. If we are going to prohibit companies from dealing with the new Department of Homeland Security, why limit it to the Department of Homeland Security? Let's prohibit them from doing business with--I guess, the closest comparable department would be the Department of Defense. But the Department of Defense uses satellites of Intelsat. I do not know the extent of the traffic, but I think it is significant, and I know it is important to the national security of this country. Intelsat is a Bermuda company, and it is an inversion. That is the sort of thing we are dealing with, if thoughtful people think this thing through before we finish up this process.
Mike Thompson: “the Senator from Texas is right. This is a significant change in procurement policy. The Senate Committee on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing procurement policy changes and their implications for companies like Intelsat.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
House Democrats have fought for months to save Americans' healthcare. That led to four Republicans working with us to bring this bill to the floor today. Yesterday, nine Republicans voted with us to bring this tax credit extension up…
Californians are all too familiar with the devastation caused by wildfires. In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.
In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives. Survivors can't afford to wait around for retroactive relief.
Mr. Speaker, this bill comes down to fairness and enforcement. When people cheat the tax system and get away with it, honest taxpayers are the ones who pay the price. If we expect whistleblowers to help close the gap, we need to protect…





