That gets to my second point, if I may. I go back to my original question. If that is the case, then why is the section under 212--the set-aside that has to do with the President's actions in the case of set-aside, which has to do with pursuing negotiations with foreign governments, notifying Congress, periodic review, exploration of Presidential set-aside --if the President did in fact decide to use his enhanced control authority, why would any of that be applicable? Certainly the exploration of the Presidential set-aside would not be applicable. Or would it?
Mike Thompson: “That gets to my second point, if I may. I go back to my original question. If that is the case, then why is the section…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the applicability of certain provisions regarding presidential authority in negotiations with foreign governments.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
I rise on behalf of thousands of California wildfire survivors. My district knows too well the devastation survivors of the southern California fires are facing. People have lost everything, and not just their homes and their belongings…
Mr. Speaker, this bill comes down to fairness and enforcement. When people cheat the tax system and get away with it, honest taxpayers are the ones who pay the price. If we expect whistleblowers to help close the gap, we need to protect…
I am honored to be able to reflect a little bit on the life and the service of an extremely dedicated Member of Congress, Doug LaMalfa. I served northern California alongside Doug from the day that he was sworn in to this body. We shared…





