I thank the Senator for addressing the issues I raised, and I ask this as a legitimate point of inquiry and not just a debating point. Mr. President, it occurs to me with regard to the Senator's first point, and that is coverage might be denied initially but later overruled, and in the interim--I think he used the example of a small child again--a child might be suffering damage, does not ERISA currently provide injunctive relief? It allows a person under those circumstances to go into Federal court for mandatory injunctive relief, and would that not address the concern the Senator has?
Mike Thompson: “I thank the Senator for addressing the issues I raised, and I ask this as a legitimate point of inquiry and not just a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of ERISA and injunctive relief during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
The supremacy clause always prevails. And I will redraft SB 254 and introduce it again next session.
I have co-chaired the bipartisan Career and Technical Education Caucus for more than a decade.
Californians are all too familiar with the devastation caused by wildfires. In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.
I rise on behalf of thousands of California wildfire survivors. My district knows too well the devastation survivors of the southern California fires are facing. People have lost everything, and not just their homes and their belongings…





