Maybe we have finally settled it. I heard the phrase ``additional requirement.'' You can argue that because this is such a massive job, we ought to hamstring the President a little bit or you can argue because this is such a massive job that we should not. But the Senator is absolutely correct in that he has laid on an additional requirement. That is the only thing I think we have been trying to establish.
Discussing the implications of an additional requirement in legislation.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
Californians are all too familiar with the devastation caused by wildfires. In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.
I rise to honor Officer Matthew Bowen of the Vacaville Police Department. Officer Bowen joined the Vacaville Police Department in 2023 and was celebrated by his friends, family, and colleagues for his kindness, humor, work ethic, and…
Mr. Speaker, talk about driving off of the cliff. That Florida district where my friend represents is going to drive off of the cliff. Mr. Speaker, 22,000 people in his district will face nutrition cuts, 91,000 people will lose their…
It is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.
Other voices in this conversation
