Not only has the Finance Committee not had a chance to consider their portion, the Judiciary Committee has not had the opportunity to consider the liability portion, which is so controversial. We are hashing out right now what this thick bill means regarding liability. It has never been in the appropriate committee to go through the natural, normal committee process on a bill of this importance; is that correct?
Discussing the lack of committee review for a controversial bill.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
Every time the Republican message has been the same: slash taxes for rich people, and the benefits trickle down to everyday Americans.
I am very concerned, however, with your Department's proposal to expand Federal control over successful CTE programs.
for folks who make the argument that people are afraid, they want to have the newest taser technology to keep themselves safe in the civilian space, I understand that. They are not precluded from being able to purchase and have this new…
Mr. Speaker, this bill shamelessly hurts our constituents, cuts healthcare for 17 million Americans, and closes one in four nursing homes and many rural hospitals. It rips nutrition assistance away from 11 million Americans, and it cedes…
Other voices in this conversation
