Mike Thompson: “But 212 is not discretionary. The language of 212, and in certain important respects, requires the President to do…”

“But 212 is not discretionary. The language of 212, and in certain important respects, requires the President to do certain things--the President shall actively pursue negotiations, et cetera. So if the language remains there, it is mandatory language, and it seems there might be some inconsistency there. I am wondering whether or not one of the things we might talk about is maybe paring this thing down a little bit in terms of some of this language in that it does appear--if my friend agrees that the enhanced control provisions are overriding. It does appear that this language would be superfluous and, if it remains, would be contradictory. I am wondering if perhaps that would be the basis of some discussion.”