we have heard several anecdotes concerning individuals who are having a problem with their coverage. We must ask yourselves, would those individuals have been any better off if they had no coverage at all? And should an employer be penalized for making the decision to have insurance coverage which may or may not present problems from time to time? That is what we are trying to resolve, and we will be discussing that issue for several days as to how best to resolve it. But we need to remember the front end of the process. It is always set up because some employer, either a large employer or a small employer, chooses to have insurance and set up an insurance plan for his employees. That is what we are dealing with here with regard to the amendment offered by the Senator from Texas. This is a very important amendment. I think this is fundamental. This is what we will be discussing today and Monday and Tuesday. It is the fundamental question of whether or not we want to sue not only HMOs for their transgressions, but whether or not we want to sue employers, whether or not we want to sue the people who do not have to set up these insurance plans and can walk away from them if they want to, can have no insurance if they want to for their employees, or they can give employees a certain amount of money and say you go take the headaches. I am talking about those individuals. Do we want to subject them to unlimited liability in lawsuits, too?
Mike Thompson: “we have heard several anecdotes concerning individuals who are having a problem with their coverage. We must ask…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of employer liability in health insurance coverage.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
I rise to honor Officer Matthew Bowen of the Vacaville Police Department. Officer Bowen joined the Vacaville Police Department in 2023 and was celebrated by his friends, family, and colleagues for his kindness, humor, work ethic, and…
In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.
I thank the gentleman for the passion he brings to this issue. I know how much work he has put into it. I want to add a couple of things on the SALT topic. One, as I think the gentleman remembers, when this was happening, my subcommittee…
In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives. Survivors can't afford to wait around for retroactive relief.





