I have not thought it through. I think after it was decontrolled in 1994, over the objections of the National Security Agency, the cat was out of the bag. I am not sure it would have made any difference. I think the point is that what we are dealing with today would further decontrol a host of additional items that heretofore you had to have a license to get. Some of those--I would venture to say the large majority of those things--would be harmless. But my concern is whether or not we have a procedure to catch the ones that are not harmless. That is what we are trying to deal with here. I hope we can move in that direction.
Mike Thompson: “I have not thought it through. I think after it was decontrolled in 1994, over the objections of the National Security…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about further decontrol of items previously requiring licenses.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
I thank the gentleman for the passion he brings to this issue. I know how much work he has put into it. I want to add a couple of things on the SALT topic. One, as I think the gentleman remembers, when this was happening, my subcommittee…
The supremacy clause always prevails. And I will redraft SB 254 and introduce it again next session.
I am honored to be able to reflect a little bit on the life and the service of an extremely dedicated Member of Congress, Doug LaMalfa. I served northern California alongside Doug from the day that he was sworn in to this body. We shared…
Californians are all too familiar with the devastation caused by wildfires. In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives.





