We are making it much more complicated than it needs to be. We are talking about whether or not this is a good idea. The sponsors of these two amendments always come forth with good ideas. I will not debate that these are possibly a couple of those good ideas. I am afraid we are not permitted to get that far because not every good idea is constitutionally permissible. I simply do not see our authority, even if we want to do this under the Constitution, to say to a State court, having lifted the preemption that was there before, that in its deliberations and in its lawsuits it will be trying, that we have, in a government of enumerated powers, the authority to reach in and do that. This is not raising an army. This is not copyrights and patents. This is not interstate commerce. I simply see no basis of authority for the Congress to do this, whether it is a good idea or not in our system of enumerated powers.
Mike Thompson: “We are making it much more complicated than it needs to be. We are talking about whether or not this is a good idea. The…”
On the recordJune 29, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutional authority of Congress during a debate on proposed amendments.
Share
More from Mike Thompson
Sep 10, 2024
There have been many great women and men who served in this Congress, walked these Halls, and cast votes on this floor, but today, we are here to reflect on the life and service of one of those great Members, Bill Pascrell. I had the honor…
Mar 11, 2024
The one that really worries me is the Congressional Review Act. It has the potential to completely undermine the franchise business model.
Jun 4, 2026
In the wake of losing their homes and livelihoods, it is wrong to tax survivors on settlement money that is meant to help them rebuild their lives. Survivors can't afford to wait around for retroactive relief.





