I was one of the conferees last year in that conference, and the language which was added here was not adopted by the conference. I do not know of any Republican in the conference or Democrat that supported the language being in the final conference report because it would have had the anomalous effect of discriminating against incumbents against challengers and is more properly part of campaign finance reform. However, that was not just Democrats in the conference that did not hold out for that language. There were no Republicans as well. And I was wondering whether or not my friend from Alaska was aware of that. And second, this amendment that is pending is amendable. If the Senator from Alaska feels there is some inconsistency here, he is free to offer an amendment to the pending amendment to strike the reimbursement for political travel the way it is stricken for recreational travel.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing campaign finance reform and an amendment during a conference report.
Share
More from Mike Levin
None of this is easy. It demands a more principled, inclusive, and constructive kind of American leadership than the one we have now.
Our bipartisan Fertility Cost Relief Act would allow individuals to take money from their retirement accounts to build a family without a financial penalty.
The proximity of that investment to a record federal loan, pushed by a White House adviser, is precisely the kind of sequence oversight is meant to examine.
For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to succeed.





