I am adamantly opposed to H.R. 478. This legislation is a transparent effort to gut the Endangered Species Act. Supporters of this bill would have us believe that the Endangered Species Act was somehow responsible for the tragic floods that occurred earlier this year in the Midwest and California. There is simply no evidence to support their claim that the Endangered Species Act was in any way linked to these events. Both the Interior and Commerce Departments have emphatically stated that there were no cases where it could be demonstrated that the implementation of the Endangered Species Act caused any flood structure to fail. The truth is that the floods in California and the Midwest were the result of storms that were unprecedented in recent history. Reservoirs and levees were simply overwhelmed. It should be noted the Endangered Species Act already contains emergency waiver provisions that permit the President to grant exemptions to ESA regulations in major disaster areas. The legislation before us would undermine the basic protections of the Endangered Species Act.
Mike Levin: “I am adamantly opposed to H.R. 478. This legislation is a transparent effort to gut the Endangered Species Act.…”
On the recordMay 7, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 478, which seeks to amend the Endangered Species Act amid claims of its link to recent floods.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 21, 2026
The high cost of IVF treatment makes it difficult for thousands of Americans to start or grow their families. Family planning and fertility treatments are too costly and out of reach for too many Americans.
Sep 3, 2026
To voluntarily strip Congress of yet another constitutional power is the wrong response at the worst possible time.
Sep 3, 2026
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.





