Mr. President, I oppose the amendment. This is a very different amendment from the one we adopted in our Armed Services Committee relative to detention. This amendment was rejected on a strong bipartisan vote in the Armed Services Committee. The reasons are set forth in a letter from the Secretary of Defense, Mr. Panetta, who wrote us: If we are to safeguard the American people, we must be in a position to employ every lawful instrument of national power--including both courts and military commissions--to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice and can no longer threaten American lives. By depriving us of one of our most potent weapons in the fight against terrorism, the Ayotte amendment would make it more likely that terrorists would escape justice and innocent lives would be put at risk. They have been successfully prosecuted. Recently in Detroit a terrorist was successfully prosecuted in an article III court. We should not deny the prosecutors this tool. I yield the remainder of my time to the Senator from Illinois, Mr. Durbin.
Share & report
More from Mike Levin
Our country is in crisis. We are broken by generations of systemic racial injustice, and it is clear that only real change in action will allow us to begin putting the fragments back together. Millions of Americans across the country and…
I am extremely fortunate to represent a coastal district with many beloved beaches, lagoons, and State parks. In California's 49th Congressional District, our public lands bring outdoor recreation and joy to our residents, and also to many…
It will also improve the VA's communication with veterans about employment placement services. It will clarify veterans' eligibility for housing stipends under the retraining program. And it will ensure the VA works with qualified…
Our democracy is in grave danger. We are seeing unrelenting efforts across the country to suppress voters and limit access to the ballot box, particularly in communities of color. We are seeing record-breaking waves of dark money backing…





