Perhaps our recollection is different, but I am not sure it makes a major difference. My recollection is in the original draft of this motion, the Senator from Washington had used the word ``recommend.'' I may be wrong on this, but this is my recollection, which I have shared with my good friend from Nevada so we are all straight with each other, as we always are. The word at some point was changed to ``proposed,'' and then a number of us on this side of the issue urged the word ``recommend" be used instead of ``proposed'' to avoid any implication that this was a proposed rulemaking. That was the reason that word did have some relevance. There is no intention here that there be a proposed rulemaking which be authorized in any way by this motion. The word ``proposed'' could create an implication which was unintended, whereas the word ``recommend'' does not have that implication. That was my recollection. If I am wrong on that, then I certainly want my friend from Nevada to know historically that was my recollection, and that is what I represented to him.
Mike Levin: “Perhaps our recollection is different, but I am not sure it makes a major difference. My recollection is in the original…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the wording of a motion and its implications during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I urge my colleagues to join me in celebrating Michaelle Jinnette, and in thanking her for the strength, compassion, and leadership she brings to families facing rare disease everywhere.
We need a substantial increase in research funding to determine the appropriate care and resources for our troops and veterans, and I will continue to fight for that on the House Appropriations Committee.
The violence settlers are inflicting on Palestinian families in the West Bank is abhorrent. It must end.
I will continue fighting for a stronger bipartisan NDAA that addresses and funds the needs of our servicemembers and their families.





