No. We can, I hope, agree on this. If, in fact, our commitment to deploy a system now causes Russia not to ratify START II, or to pull out from START I, leaving her with thousands of additional warheads that she otherwise would have gotten rid of, it will indeed make us less secure. That is why this bill should be called the Reduce America's Security Act of 1996--because the commitment to deploy this defense prematurely will, in the view of General Shalikashvili and the Joint Chiefs, who share his view, cause Russia to pull out from START I, not to ratify START II, and that will make us less secure.
Mike Levin: “No. We can, I hope, agree on this. If, in fact, our commitment to deploy a system now causes Russia not to ratify START…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a missile defense system on U.S.-Russia arms treaties.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Her passion for helping others also led her to establish Working Women Winning, a program that equips women with the skills, connections, and opportunities necessary to build rewarding careers and achieve financial stability.
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.





