Is it correct then that the manager does not intend that the amendment would restrict the scope of remedies available to the plaintiffs in the litigation in which the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia has recently held that the 1998 deadline is a binding obligation of the Federal Government?
Questioning the implications of an amendment related to federal obligations in ongoing litigation.
Share
More from Mike Levin
We urge your timely submission of these required reports to Congress, and that you lift the procedural hurdles to clean energy deployment that the Department has implemented.
The suffering caused by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is staggering. Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and families across the region, Israeli and Palestinian alike, have endured unimaginable loss. American…
Other voices in this conversation
