Is it correct then that the manager does not intend that the amendment would restrict the scope of remedies available to the plaintiffs in the litigation in which the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia has recently held that the 1998 deadline is a binding obligation of the Federal Government?
Mike Levin: “Is it correct then that the manager does not intend that the amendment would restrict the scope of remedies available to…”
On the recordJuly 31, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of an amendment related to federal obligations in ongoing litigation.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Sep 3, 2026
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
Oct 3, 2026
Her passion for helping others also led her to establish Working Women Winning, a program that equips women with the skills, connections, and opportunities necessary to build rewarding careers and achieve financial stability.
Oct 3, 2026
Through her tireless service, Debbie has provided hope to families during their most difficult moments and helped countless women pursue brighter futures.
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.





