I want to just respond to that, because the words in the President's language is not ``these need to be achieved.'' In fairness--and I do not consider this to be an abundantly clear document. That is the reason why I think we should speak as to what our own beliefs are, and that is why this resolution is introduced. But the document says, ``conditions under which Dayton implementation can continue without the support of a major NATO-led military force.''
Mike Levin: “I want to just respond to that, because the words in the President's language is not ``these need to be achieved.'' In…”
On the recordJune 24, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the clarity of a document related to NATO and Dayton implementation.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Sep 3, 2026
We urge you to immediately reinstate the funding for these projects that were subject to blatantly partisan cancellation.
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
Sep 3, 2026
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.





