With respect to a deadline imposed for the first time in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996, is it the manager's intention that section 101(g) proscribe a court order that the Secretary of Energy comply with such deadline, or granting relief other than money damages to contract holders?
Questioning the implications of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996.
Share
More from Mike Levin
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Through her tireless service, Debbie has provided hope to families during their most difficult moments and helped countless women pursue brighter futures.
We urge you to immediately reinstate the funding for these projects that were subject to blatantly partisan cancellation.
Other voices in this conversation
