With respect to a deadline imposed for the first time in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996, is it the manager's intention that section 101(g) proscribe a court order that the Secretary of Energy comply with such deadline, or granting relief other than money damages to contract holders?
Questioning the implications of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996.
Share
More from Mike Levin
My vote today does not reflect a position on changing the composition and structure of the Supreme Court.
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
Congress must now work in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to authorize the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses and write them into law with clear oversight, clear benchmarks, and clear connections to permanent disposal.
Our bipartisan Fertility Cost Relief Act would allow individuals to take money from their retirement accounts to build a family without a financial penalty.
Other voices in this conversation
