the antiterrorism bill which the Senate is about to pass reflects the sentiments the American people have expressed since the events of September 11--that we must act swiftly and strongly to defend our country without sacrificing our most cherished values. The Senate antiterrorism legislation meets that test. It responds to these dangerous times by giving law enforcement agencies important new tools to use in combating terrorism without denigrating the principles of due process and fairness embedded in our Constitution. The bill is not perfect. In fact, during the Senate's consideration of its bill, I supported three amendments offered by Senator Feingold. Each of the Feingold amendments would have strengthened privacy protections for American citizens without undermining law enforcement efforts to investigate terrorists. One amendment would have maintained limits in Federal and State law on law enforcement access to personal records, particularly with regards to sensitive medical and financial information. A second amendment would have required law enforcement to ascertain that a surveillance target under the antiterrorism bill's expanded wiretap authority was actually in the house that was bugged or using the phone that was tapped before surveillance could be initiated. The third amendment that I supported would have placed sensible limits on the government's ability to intercept computer communications.
Mike Levin: “the antiterrorism bill which the Senate is about to pass reflects the sentiments the American people have expressed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the antiterrorism bill in the Senate following the September 11 attacks.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I urge my colleagues to join me in celebrating Michaelle Jinnette, and in thanking her for the strength, compassion, and leadership she brings to families facing rare disease everywhere.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
This deeply unpopular and unrelated bill should not be attached to the NDAA.
For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to succeed.





