Shays-Meehan is clear about voter guides. What the Doolittle amendment does is to essentially gut Shays-Meehan in terms of sham issue ads. The gentleman from California says he wants a bright line so only certain words would be covered. In first amendment instances, there are no bright lines in terms of free speech, that you can only use such words or you cannot. In terms of censorship, the Supreme Court standard does not have a bright line, allowing only this word or that word. What the gentleman from California would do would be to gut the heart of this bill. Vote ``no.''
On the recordSeptember 14, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the Doolittle amendment during debate on campaign finance reform.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Aug 7, 2026
Instead, they founded the Cure KCNH1 Foundation and set out to build related scientific research and inspire hope that did not yet exist for families like theirs.
Jul 28, 2026
“Esmeralda and David represent the very best of what community means. They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
Jul 16, 2026
I firmly believe in a future where Israelis and Palestinians live side by side in peace, security, and self-determination.
Jul 28, 2026
“Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to recognize Esmeralda Gonzalez and David Ontiveros, residents of Oceanside, as my Co-Constituents of the Month for June 2026.





