I do not challenge or question the sincerity of the members of the commission. Indeed, very distinguished people. But true bipartisanship means, I think, if it is going to be at all effective, a reflection of the mainstream within each party. This commission, as Ari Fleischer said, had on it people who favored privatization. And that is what Mr. Fleischer said; these were his terms, private retirement accounts. All of them share the President's views that these accounts are the way to save Social Security. So what we put in, we get out. And when we put in a uniform point of view that does not encompass the mainstream of both parties, we are going to get out of it deep division.
Mike Levin: “I do not challenge or question the sincerity of the members of the commission. Indeed, very distinguished people. But…”
On the recordDecember 11, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of true bipartisanship in a commission related to Social Security.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Sep 3, 2026
There is no other acceptable remedy for this corrupt abuse of power and weaponization of taxpayer dollars.
Oct 8, 2026
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
Sep 3, 2026
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.





