I just have one question to my dear friend from North Dakota. Is it the intention of this amendment that if the person who was victimized by the flood or fire had personal insurance, that that personal insurance be first exhausted and then any Federal FEMA benefits or other benefits then be next exhausted prior to the kicking in of this particular language that the Senator is offering?
Questioning the intent of an amendment related to disaster relief and insurance.
Share
More from Mike Levin
David's commitment to the greater good and Esmeralda's steadfast leadership remind us that strong communities are built one dedicated person at a time.
We urge your timely submission of these required reports to Congress, and that you lift the procedural hurdles to clean energy deployment that the Department has implemented.
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.
I will continue fighting for a stronger bipartisan NDAA that addresses and funds the needs of our servicemembers and their families.
Other voices in this conversation
