Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 11, 1995
That is exactly what is in the statute. It does not talk about lives and it does not talk about breathing. What the statute says in my hypothetical is you must get to at least 10 parts per trillion of a toxic substance. Beyond that, the agency is allowed to use some discretion using cost-benefit analysis and risk analysis. Under my hypothetical, you get to six in a very cost-effective way, but under the Senator's bill, because it says you must use the least-cost method to get to an alternative, which is in the statute, since 10 is an alternative permitted by statute, your least cost drives you to 10, whereas cost-benefit drives you to six. There is a conflict between the cost-benefit and the least cost and I think--by the way, Senator Roth is someone who is on the floor who knows a great deal about this subject and I think has some similar concerns with this.
Said by
Mike Levin
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of cost-benefit analysis versus least-cost methods in environmental regulation.

Share

More from Mike Levin

Jul 28, 2026

“Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to recognize Esmeralda Gonzalez and David Ontiveros, residents of Oceanside, as my Co-Constituents of the Month for June 2026.

levin.house.gov
Jul 20, 2026

We need a substantial increase in research funding to determine the appropriate care and resources for our troops and veterans, and I will continue to fight for that on the House Appropriations Committee.

rollcall.com
Jul 23, 2026

Unfortunately, this NDAA includes unpopular, extremist policy riders.

levin.house.gov
Jul 7, 2026

David's commitment to the greater good and Esmeralda's steadfast leadership remind us that strong communities are built one dedicated person at a time.

levin.house.gov

Other voices in this conversation