if I could spend 30 seconds, I have long believed that work requirements should be clear, strong, and applied promptly. For too long we have permitted welfare dependency to undermine the potential productivity of too many able-bodied Americans. We have allowed too many able-bodied welfare recipients not to work. That is wrong. The amendment which I am offering would add a requirement that welfare recipients be in job training and school or working in private sector jobs within 6 months of receipt of benefits, and if private sector jobs could not be found they be required to perform some type of community service employment. The requirement would be phased in over 3 years to allow States the chance to adjust administratively. We have added in this modification a opt-out provision for States by notification of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and also to make clear the intent to conform to the modifications which Senator Dole made to his amendment No. 2280 last week. The bill before us requires recipients to work within no more than 2 years of receipt of benefits. Why wait that long? Why wait 2 years? Unless an able-bodied person is in school or job training, why wait longer than 6 months to require that a person have a private job or be performing community service? My amendment says 6 months instead of 2 years. There is no doubt that there is a great need in local communities across the country for community service workers.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing welfare reform and the need for work requirements for recipients.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I urge my colleagues to join me in celebrating Michaelle Jinnette, and in thanking her for the strength, compassion, and leadership she brings to families facing rare disease everywhere.
When Michaelle’s son Tristan was diagnosed with an ultra-rare genetic condition, she and her husband, Kevin, refused to accept that there was nothing to be done.
The high cost of IVF treatment makes it difficult for thousands of Americans to start or grow their families. Family planning and fertility treatments are too costly and out of reach for too many Americans.
This is one of the single largest loans in the history of OSC, and a commitment of that scale warrants careful review on its own.





