Is it understood that the Environmental Protection Agency has the discretion to define ``threat to public health'' and ``urgent case'' as those terms are applied to the exceptions? Further, is it understood that the EPA has the discretion to define ``properly considered.''
Questioning the discretion of the EPA in defining terms related to public health.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Gaza must be rebuilt, and aid to its residents must flow unimpeded. Palestinians deserve to live free from bombardment, displacement, and blockade.
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.
This deeply unpopular and unrelated bill should not be attached to the NDAA.
When Michaelle’s son Tristan was diagnosed with an ultra-rare genetic condition, she and her husband, Kevin, refused to accept that there was nothing to be done.
Other voices in this conversation
