I think today it was said in the Chamber that the Federal Election Commission test has been stricken by the Supreme Court's decision today, and that is simply not accurate. What the Supreme Court decided today was not to review a case, not to review a case from a court of appeals in which the Court said that the Federal Election Commission regulation was not constitutional. But we have another court of appeals in the Furgatch case adopting language which is the basis of the Federal Election Commission regulation, and the Supreme Court didn't review the ninth circuit's decision. So we have two decisions unreviewed by the Supreme Court, the ninth circuit decision with Furgatch language and a first circuit decision with the FEC language which is based on Furgatch.
Mike Levin: “I think today it was said in the Chamber that the Federal Election Commission test has been stricken by the Supreme…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a Supreme Court decision on Federal Election Commission regulations.
Share
More from Mike Levin
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.





