Finally, I would like to address section 6 of the bill, which requires a determination by the President that, among other things, the Government of Russia has demonstrated a sustained commitment to seek out and prevent the transfer to Iran of goods, services and technology that ``could'' make a material contribution to the development of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, or of ballistic or cruise missile systems. It is my understanding that the use of the word ``could'' in this provision is not intended to go beyond other nonproliferation requirements or require the President to consider remote or absurdly hypothetical circumstances. Is that correct?
Mike Levin: “Finally, I would like to address section 6 of the bill, which requires a determination by the President that, among…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing section 6 of a bill related to nonproliferation and Russia's commitments.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Inspired by her own journey as a single mother, she created The Flora May Foundation which provides parents with free counseling, crisis assistance, and other critical resources.
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.





