It was not in the bill last year. This was a language that was in a bill introduced on a Wednesday night, which went to a hearing on Thursday morning, which was intended to go to a markup on a Friday morning which we had to plead for a delay of over the weekend for the markup to a Monday morning. When we made an effort to get a committee report on this, we denied that committee report so that it could come to the floor the next day. This is the language that was not in last year's report which is very new, novel, significant language. Now, I repeat: I am someone who supported last year's bill. But I think this goes too far and raises very significant questions which are worthy of real examination on the floor.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about new language in a bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
A government should work for the people, not for whoever writes the biggest cheque. Open the bridge.
Today’s announcement of potential sites for Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses has been years in the making.
The suffering caused by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is staggering. Tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and families across the region, Israeli and Palestinian alike, have endured unimaginable loss. American…
Head Start is not just preschool. For hundreds of thousands of children from low-income families, it is where they learn to read, receive basic health screenings, get support for disabilities, and begin kindergarten with a real chance to…





