My own preference would have been, instead of a direct loan from us, that there be a loan from a third party, guaranteed by us. That is my preference because that would have taken away any possibility of misconstruing what we are doing, any propaganda value that might be gained by anybody else by saying somehow or other the United States is going to be a creditor, therefore, we have designs on Iraq. That could have been avoided if there were a third party making the loan, with our guarantee. If this amendment were not adopted--and I hope it will be--I would offer such a loan guarantee amendment as a preferable way to go. But this amendment is preferable to the grant approach of the administration. I yield the floor.
Mike Levin: “My own preference would have been, instead of a direct loan from us, that there be a loan from a third party, guaranteed…”
On the recordOctober 16, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing preferences for loan structures related to Iraq during a floor speech.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Oct 3, 2026
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
Oct 3, 2026
Through her tireless service, Debbie has provided hope to families during their most difficult moments and helped countless women pursue brighter futures.
Sep 3, 2026
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.





