I thank my colleague for his helpful explanation. There is one more issue I would like to discuss. Section 211 of your amendment includes a definition of ``material information.'' I want to be absolutely clear that this definition is specific to section 211 and is in no way intended to provide any meaning to the phrase ``material information'' as used elsewhere in the STOCK Act or anywhere else in law.
Share
More from Mike Levin
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
We urge you to immediately reinstate the funding for these projects that were subject to blatantly partisan cancellation.
Other voices in this conversation
