Mike Levin: “I believe that is correct. Under that section, the courts have adopted the following standard, that the procedural…”

“I believe that is correct. Under that section, the courts have adopted the following standard, that the procedural errors ``were so serious and related to matters of such central relevance to the rule that there is a substantial likelihood that the rule would have been significantly changed if such errors had not been made.'' So that has been the interpretation under 706 by the courts, that the procedural errors ``were so serious and related to matters of such central relevance to the rule that there is a substantial likelihood that the rule would have been significantly changed if such errors had not been made.'' That interpretation is a narrowing interpretation where the new language----”