I am wondering whether or not the $200 million figure also goes up as well? It does. All right. That is fine if there is an inflation factor already built in. I thank the Senator from Ohio. Now, getting back to this question, let us assume that there is an estimate that the first affected year, the first fiscal year in which the mandate is in effect, let us say it is the year 2001. That is what CBO says. We have no better information. It is a guesstimate probably at best, the way a lot of these are going to be. But that is it. And so the threshold is now triggered. At that point we have to put the critical language in the bill that, unless the Appropriations Committee in the year 2001 puts in $50 million to fund this particular mandate, an agency 5 years from now must reduce the level of this mandate or, if no money is appropriated, must take the local and State governments off the hook totally. That language must be in the authorization bill that is passed now for 10 years from now.
On the recordJanuary 23, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding mandates and estimates for fiscal year 2001 during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Jul 21, 2026
Our bipartisan Fertility Cost Relief Act would allow individuals to take money from their retirement accounts to build a family without a financial penalty.
Jul 29, 2026
Congress must now work in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to authorize the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses and write them into law with clear oversight, clear benchmarks, and clear connections to permanent disposal.
Jul 23, 2026
I urge the Senate to remove the SAVE America Act and remedy the poison pills included in this bill as it has done in past years.
Jul 16, 2026
The violence settlers are inflicting on Palestinian families in the West Bank is abhorrent. It must end.





