I, first of all, think he laid out a series of very important questions, and I concur that those are critical questions that need to be answered prior to the use of ground forces in Bosnia. But my question of the Senator is this: He pointed out this is not legally binding because it is a sense-of-the-Senate resolution. If this same language at a later time were offered without the words that it is a 'sense of the Senate' so that it did then become a legally binding document or language, would it be consistent for those of us who might vote yes today to vote no at a later time because of the timing of the offer of that language or for any other of a number of possible reasons?
Mike Levin: “I, first of all, think he laid out a series of very important questions, and I concur that those are critical questions…”
On the recordSeptember 29, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a Senate resolution regarding the use of ground forces in Bosnia.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Oct 3, 2026
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
Sep 3, 2026
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.





