The Republican leader, a few moments ago, said this happens around here from time to time--that 60 votes are required. Is it not true the reason 60 votes are required from time to time is because there is the threat of a filibuster unless the opponents succeed in getting an agreement that there be 60 votes? It is the short way to find out whether the debate will be had. Is it not true, though, that it is the threat of a filibuster the opponents make which produces an agreement to get 60 votes?
Share & report
More from Mike Levin
I thank our great chairman, Chairman Takano, and our ranking member for their great work. It is an honor to continue serving our veterans in a bipartisan manner and to chair the relevant subcommittee. As the Representative for Marine Corps…
As the proud vice chair of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, I particularly want to call out the critical relief that the American Rescue Plan provides for those who have served our country. The bill includes important funding for…
As the designee of Chairman Pallone, pursuant to House Resolution 1129, I offer amendments en bloc. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the amendments en bloc. Amendments en bloc 4 consisting of amendment Nos. 33, 34, 46, 53…





