If a deadline were imposed by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996, as reflected by the substitute amendment, as well as by the Nuclear Waste Policy of 1982 or the contracts executed thereunder, is it the manager's intention that section 101(g) would proscribe financial liability for failure to meet the deadline to the extent it is imposed by the 1982 act? For instance, if DOE were to fail to commence the acceptance and emplacement of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste by November 30, 1999 or thereafter, would the amendment proscribe a court from imposing financial liability on DOE if a court ruled that DOE's inaction constituted a failure to comply with the deadline established in section 302(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and the contracts?
Mike Levin: “If a deadline were imposed by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1996, as reflected by the substitute amendment, as well as…”
On the recordJuly 31, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of deadlines in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act during a legislative discussion.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Oct 8, 2026
USDA must take these findings seriously and act quickly to address the gaps identified by GAO.
Oct 3, 2026
For nearly a decade, Debbie has devoted herself to making sure families have the resources and support they need when life presents its greatest challenges.
Sep 3, 2026
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.





