Cloture is not a new phenomenon when it comes to the debate over judges. Yet we hear now that suddenly the requirement that there be a cloture vote is something that is new to this Senate. It is not. It has been historically used. It is appropriate, and it is rare. As Senator Dorgan pointed out, 93 percent of the judges who were nominated by President Bush were confirmed when there were votes that came to the floor of the Senate. Ninety-three percent of these judges were confirmed. And the comparison to that of the Clinton years, where so many judges could not even get a hearing, where there was a filibuster in the Judiciary Committee because of the refusal to grant judges a hearing, is quite a contrast.
Mike Levin: “Cloture is not a new phenomenon when it comes to the debate over judges. Yet we hear now that suddenly the requirement…”
On the recordNovember 18, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the historical context of cloture votes on judicial nominations.
Share
More from Mike Levin
Oct 8, 2026
More than one million veterans face food insecurity in this country. That is one million too many.
Sep 3, 2026
For more than a decade, Nick and Cheryl have used the power of film to bring the wonders of the ocean, and the dangers facing it, into homes around the world.
Oct 8, 2026
I am also concerned that, following staffing cuts in 2025, USDA has failed to fill critical positions that support coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs on veteran hunger.
Oct 3, 2026
Inspired by her own journey as a single mother, she created The Flora May Foundation which provides parents with free counseling, crisis assistance, and other critical resources.





