There is a major difference between what happened then and what is being proposed by Senator Kyl now. That side agreement... would absolutely derail this New START agreement. Second, that was a political agreement, that side agreement that was entered into, which would last as long as the Presidents of both countries were in office but would not necessarily last beyond that because it was not a legally binding agreement in that sense. So there are two major differences between what happened at the time of START I and what is being proposed here by Senator Kyl. I hope we could defeat the Kyl amendment No. 4860.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses differences between past agreements and a current amendment related to the New START treaty.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I urge my colleagues to join me in celebrating Michaelle Jinnette, and in thanking her for the strength, compassion, and leadership she brings to families facing rare disease everywhere.
“Esmeralda and David represent the very best of what community means. They do not wait to be asked; they simply show up, roll up their sleeves, and give everything they have to the people around them.
The proximity of that investment to a record federal loan, pushed by a White House adviser, is precisely the kind of sequence oversight is meant to examine.
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.





