But my question is--if it turns out otherwise, there have to be cuts made somewhere, under the Senator's amendment, as he has just responded. He is not adding any money, so there must be cuts made somewhere. And those cuts, of course, could then come in areas that we have tried to protect, including operations and maintenance, readiness, and a number of other areas of which this committee has been very protective. One of my concerns about the language of this amendment is that it is not contingent upon savings being available. It assumes those savings are available. And whether or not they are forthcoming, this money is authorized, as I understand it. So that is one of the concerns I have about this amendment.
Mike Levin: “But my question is--if it turns out otherwise, there have to be cuts made somewhere, under the Senator's amendment, as…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over an amendment related to budget cuts and funding.
Share
More from Mike Levin
My vote today does not reflect a position on changing the composition and structure of the Supreme Court.
The high cost of IVF treatment makes it difficult for thousands of Americans to start or grow their families. Family planning and fertility treatments are too costly and out of reach for too many Americans.
The uptick in reported TBI cases among veterans underlines the urgency to increase funding for the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program to study servicemembers’ and veterans’ brain injuries.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.





