I will simply say that last year we were told any amendment to last year's bill would be viewed as a bill killer. That is what we were told by the National Governors Association, the legislatures, and counties. Last year's bill had a sunset in it. They opposed knocking out the sunset last year because they opposed any amendment and sunset was in the bill. What has changed since last year? The Senator from Idaho supported sunset last year. What has changed since last year? You do not have to wait until 6 years comes to change the bill. There is no implication in a sunset amendment that you have to wait. You can change it tomorrow. It just makes sure we can change things more easily if we decide to do so. My time is up.
Mike Levin: “I will simply say that last year we were told any amendment to last year's bill would be viewed as a bill killer. That…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of sunset provisions in legislation during a floor debate.
Share
More from Mike Levin
My vote today does not reflect a position on changing the composition and structure of the Supreme Court.
This blatant weaponization of federal taxpayer dollars to punish states based on their political leanings is wholly inappropriate and in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws.
Her passion for helping others also led her to establish Working Women Winning, a program that equips women with the skills, connections, and opportunities necessary to build rewarding careers and achieve financial stability.
Through her tireless service, Debbie has provided hope to families during their most difficult moments and helped countless women pursue brighter futures.





