Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 27, 1995
I will restate my question. I understood the Senator from Idaho to say that the Chair would not be precluded basically from upholding a point of order, or ruling that the threshold has been exceeded even if there is a statement from the Congressional Budget Office and the Budget Committee that it is unable to state that the threshold is exceeded. The Chair would not be precluded, from what the Senator said. However, my question is, is it his intention that it would generally be the case that if the Chair has no basis to rule that a point of order would lie for the threshold being exceeded, that it would therefore not rule that a point of order lies? It is my intent to ask the chairman of the Budget Committee, by the way, these questions as well when he is able to return to the floor. But I think it is important we get the intent of the manager on this question. It is a very important question as to whether this process can function.
Said by
Mike Levin
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Questioning the procedural rulings related to budget thresholds during Senate floor debate.

Share

More from Mike Levin

Jul 23, 2026

There is no justification for it and no clear strategy.

levin.house.gov
Jul 2, 2026

I want to be careful and fair here. Not one of these facts, standing alone, proves anything improper.

levin.house.gov
Jul 29, 2026

Congress must now work in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to authorize the Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses and write them into law with clear oversight, clear benchmarks, and clear connections to permanent disposal.

levin.house.gov
Jul 2, 2026

There is also an environmental dimension to this that cannot be ignored.

levin.house.gov

Other voices in this conversation