I vehemently disagree. I urge the Senator from Connecticut to read the language, which flat out says: We affirm ``the United States has at all times the inherent right to use military force in self-defense. . . .'' We affirm that. The Senator from Connecticut, in the resolution in 1991, did not even affirm that. It just simply authorized the President to use military force pursuant to the United Nations Security Council resolution. No one suggested then that anyone was ceding the power to use our force to the United Nations. Yet in our resolution, the alternative resolution, the multilateral resolution, for some reason, the folks who are supporting the go-it-alone resolution are suggesting we are ceding something to the U.N. when we explicitly reaffirm our right to self-defense.
Mike Levin: “I vehemently disagree. I urge the Senator from Connecticut to read the language, which flat out says: We affirm ``the…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the use of military force and the implications of resolutions regarding self-defense.
Share
More from Mike Levin
I urge the Senate to remove the SAVE America Act and remedy the poison pills included in this bill as it has done in past years.
“Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to recognize Esmeralda Gonzalez and David Ontiveros, residents of Oceanside, as my Co-Constituents of the Month for June 2026.
These new tariffs are more of the same: a nationwide sales tax that will make life even harder for families already struggling under the costs of Trump’s reckless war in Iran.
Michaelle’s determination has connected families across the globe and helped launch new research into a disorder shared by fewer than 100 children worldwide.





